Which case mandates that officers must have sufficient training and experience in the use of moving radar?

The case that mandates officers must have sufficient training and experience in the use of moving radar is Honeycutt v. Commonwealth. This ruling emphasizes the importance of proper training for law enforcement personnel in utilizing radar technology to ensure that speed measurements are accurate and legally defensible. The court recognized that unreliable evidence due to improper usage could jeopardize prosecutions for speeding violations.

In contrast, the other cases do not specifically address the training requirements for moving radar, focusing more on different aspects of law enforcement or evidential considerations. Understanding the implications of Honeycutt v. Commonwealth helps reinforce the necessity for police officers to be adequately trained, not only for the proper operation of radar devices but also for ensuring public safety and legal accountability in speed enforcement actions.